Response to the statement of the Ministry and Negotiating Team
Republic of Serbia
Ministry for European Integration
Belgrade
TANJUG
Obilicev venac 2
11000 Belgrade
The request for a response and reaction to the statement of the Ministry for European Integration and the Negotiating Team
In the Press Release of the Ministry for European Integration and Negotiating Team (hereinafter MEI and NT), which is conveyed by Tanjug (the Ministry on its website transferred it from Tanjug) on November 6th 2017, under the heading “Part of civil society to politicize the negotiations with the EU, “falsehood transmitted incorrectly interpreted and applied in the context obviously distorted, statements program Director of Transparency Serbia given in an interview published by the news agency FoNet on 5th of November 2017 in a way that could harm the honour or reputation. Therefore, we expect that in keeping with the spirit of cooperation, standards, public communication and legal obligations, the requirements publish and distribute the same way as it is published and distributed to the Press Release noted MEI and NT.
MEI and NT said that “they noticed that there are tendencies of a part of civil society, the process of cooperation obstructed, and the content of individual, primarily technical issues being politicized. “Bellow these national authorities respond only to “claims the director of “Transparency” Nemanja Nenadic, “it is only logical to think that the MEI and NT wish to point out that it is precisely the organization “Transparency Serbia” wants to obstruct cooperation (it was not clear whose cooperation might be referring to the Republic of Serbia and the EU) and to politicize “technical questions”. But for these charges MEI and NT does not cite any evidence, that is, do not point to any statement of N. Nenadic which would serve as an indicator of “obstruction of cooperation” or “politicization of technical issues”.
Furthermore, MEI and NT allegedly in response to claims by Nemanja Nenadic, said that for them “the essence is undoubtedly more important than form. “Since the statement said Nemanja Nenadic does not mention that the MEI and NT “form is more important than substance” responding to such claim is moot. Comments by Nemanja Nenadic referred to precisely identified document – a statement MEI and NT, which was presented as a reaction unidentified persons from MEI/NT Tanjug, all in report of the coalition “prEUgovor” on monitoring progress in chapters 23 and 24 or the negotiations of the Republic of Serbia and the EU. Nenadic in an interview pointed out that the MEI and NT in this announcement dealt a form of communication between the NGO coalition prEUgovor and MEI/NT (that the coalition should be presentation of the report requested some information from MEI/NT, the coalition prEUgovor not part of the platform National convent for the EU, and the like). But that did not deal with the content of the report of the coalition (Transparency Serbia is one of the seven organizations that make up this coalition).
Since the reactions MEI/NT and the report of the Coalition prEUgovor are publicly available documents, anyone who is interested can itself be satisfied that the statement MEI/NT is really not related to the content of the report prEUgovor, but the question of communication between MEI/NT and civil society and the various forms of this communication (via platform Konventa EU or outside it)
MEI and NT continues to react explain what the convent and were always willing to talk with others who are looking for such a conversation, and that all information on the negotiation process within the jurisdiction of MEI and NT published on the site. Interview of N. Nenadic is not generally involved in these issues.
MEI and NT argues that “the fulfilment of the action plans of the 100 percent goal of negotiations in Chapters 23 and 24 at the time of their detention. Furthermore argue that “during the negotiations, the crucial continuous implementation of reforms and the gradual achievement of European standards in the field of rule a law” and that the current revision of the plans of action to “in order to achieve even better results than the current 70-80 per cent fulfilment of the planned activities at this stage, which is a great result but we believe that we can achieve even better”.
In this part of the response MEI and NT POLEMIS (although this is not stated) with the statement of N. Nenadic from interview that the fulfilment of the plans below 100% failure (“all below 100% is a failure if it is needed a priority. It is obvious that within the executive authorities that issue does not pay enough attention.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBb4zWrzF68).
On this occasion, we express surprise at such an attitude MEI and NT. The effect of the Serbian authorities in achieving the action plans is measured in relation to those activities that are due at that time, and not in relation to the goals set for the moment of accession of the Republic of Serbia to the European Union. Thus, when a government body for monitoring the implementation of AP for Chapter 23 says that this was realized 66% of the activities for the whole of this negotiation chapter, or 53% of the part related to the fight against corruption, these percentages expressing the degree of realization of commitments that had to be made until the end of September 2017 as well as those of operations carried out continuously, and not the total number of task that are in front of Serbia by the moment of PRISTUPANJA. Given that the deadlines for the implementation of activities identified precisely Government of Serbia, its conclusions of April 27th 2016, it is only appropriate to consider that only 100% fulfilment of the plan could be considered satisfactory success.
In the following statements, MEI and NT report that is structured negotiation process, what are the criteria on which the interim agreed by all Member States as well as the level to be achieved in the field of rule of law and how to prepare reports. None of that has been the subject of an interview with N. Nenadic.
MEI and NT then point out that before operation reports on the fulfilment of the actions plans to the European Commission those reports available to the local public and to talk about it. Then they say: “We have all this information and reports transparent and accessible, we assume that the director of Transparency noticed this bar. I still think that this is not due to fulfilment of form, but because of the essence”. It is incomprehensible that MEI and NT allow ourselves this kind of public communication. In fact, not only is the Director of Transparency “noted” reports on the implementation of action plans for chapters, but the content of these reports dozens of times commented in public, including several public meetings at which the implementation of the Action Plan for Chapter 23 discusses just with representatives (current) Ministry of European Integration and members if the negotiation team.
Transparency Serbia, Belgrade, November 7th 2017
News
Response to the reaction of EXPO 2027 company
Reacting to the press release of TS according to which the average number of bids in EXPO procurement is 1.64, and the average number of acceptable bids is 1.16, the company EXPO 2027 stated that the average number of bids is 1.93. The problem, however, is that the EXPO 2027 company…
... detaljnije ...EXPO procurement - Half a billion euros without competition
Special rules for EXPO procurement significantly reduced even such a low level of competition in public procurement procedures. TS monitoring of all procurements carried out so far by special "EXPO companies", worth around 550 million euros, showed that the average number of bids in those procurements is 1.64 per procedure…
... detaljnije ...What the change of government means for the fight against corruption
The overwhelming victory of the list, which included numerous measures to fight corruption in its pre-election program, gives hope that Serbia will finally stop the decline in this area. In this regard, Transparency Serbia highlights as particularly significant: the promises of repealing special laws adopting with mere purpose of avoiding tenders…
... detaljnije ...The transformation of public enterprises did not bring an increase in transparency
The transformation of public companies into joint-stock companies and limited liability companies did not bring an increase in transparency, according to research conducted by Transparency Serbia. The PETRA 2026 survey included 34 state-owned enterprises that were evaluated and ranked based on 30 indicators. The average score is 42.1% (out of the…
... detaljnije ...Plans for Promotional Activities Have Rendered the Ban on Official-Holder Campaigning Meaningless
Official-holder campaigning in Serbia has neither been restricted nor prevented, as the recent amendments to the Law on the Prevention of Corruption have merely created the appearance that this area is regulated. Transparency Serbia’s monitoring shows that official-holder campaigning continues unabated through promotional activities. In most cases, officials have legal cover under…
... detaljnije ...Extended Incumbent’s Campaign
Nemanja Nenadić for CorD magazine The outcome of the election and the acceptance of results by participants remain uncertain. Legitimacy can be threatened by the bribing or blackmailing of voters (with the provision of evidence that they voted in a certain way), but mostly by the passivity of the police in…
... detaljnije ...Average LTI 2026 still 52 points — Novi Pazar shares the top with Veliko Gradište
The local self-government transparency index LTI 2026 remained at relatively low level 52 out of a possible 100 points. After several years of continuous growth, the average rating has now stagnated at the same level for the fourth year in a row, according to the survey Local Transparency Index -…
... detaljnije ...Elections to Be Held Under Worse Conditions Than in 2023
The elections, announced for 25 October, will be held under significantly worse conditions than those in 2023, despite several amendments to laws relevant to the electoral process. With regard to some of the key ODIHR recommendations, there has been no attempt whatsoever to introduce changes, either to the legislation or to…
... detaljnije ...Illegal Procurement Procedure for Voting Booths
Transparency Serbia has submitted an initiative to the Public Procurement Office to determine whether the Republic Electoral Commission violated the law in procuring voting booths. TS pointed out that the public procurement procedure was initiated even though it was not included in the annual procurement plan, and there are no grounds…
... detaljnije ...GRECO confirmed that recommendations have not been fulfilled
It is alarming that Serbia has fulfilled only three of the 24 GRECO recommendations for combating corruption in the executive branch and the police, even though the deadline expired almost three years ago (30 September 2023). Not only have laws that would contribute to fulfilling the recommendations not been adopted…
... detaljnije ...
ODIHR Opinion Confirms That the Debate on the Proposed Amendments to the Law on Financing Political Activities Is Premature
The proposed amendments to the Law on Financing Political Activities do not meet some of ODIHR’s key recommendations, according to Transparency Serbia1, and this assessment has now been confirmed in the ODIHR opinion published today2. Since it is evident that the authorities will need to amend and supplement the proposal…
... detaljnije ...Serbia slips into open backsliding: authorities dismantle even past reform gains
PrEUgovor Alarm report on the progress of Serbia in Cluster 1 – May 2026 is published and presented Serbia moved visibly further away from its goal of European Union membership, slipping from stagnation into open backsliding. It is no longer merely a matter of the authorities persistently refusing to fully implement…
... detaljnije ...ODIHR Confirms: Stronger Oversight and Credible Sanctions Needed for Election Campaign Financing
The draft amendments to the Law on Financing Political Activities, on which ODIHR issued an opinion, failed to address some of the key recommendations. These include measures that would ensure stronger oversight and appropriate sanctions. Many of the shortcomings identified by ODIHR could be remedied if the law were amended…
... detaljnije ...Agency Decisions on TS Complaints Regarding Violations of Campaign Regulations
The Agency for Prevention of Corruption has issued decisions on some of the complaints submitted by Transparency Serbia due to suspicions that political actors, as well as national and local officials, violated regulations during the local election campaigns in ten cities and municipalities. All cases in which decisions were made relate…
... detaljnije ...What is(not) visible from the preliminary campaign expenditure reports
Although all candidate lists for municipal assemblies in the ten municipalities were required to submit preliminary campaign expenditure reports by March 20, only slightly more than half (26 out of 49), according to the data published by the Anti-Corruption Agency, have fulfilled this obligation. Transparency Serbia advocates for a change…
... detaljnije ...Budgetary financing of campaigns – modest amounts, not planned in time
Of the ten cities, municipalities, and city municipalities where regular elections will be held on March 29, 2026, only Knjaževac clearly indicated how much it will allocate for financing the election campaign, while Sevojno is the only municipality that has calculated the total allocations for party financing during the budget…
... detaljnije ...Open Budget Index: Limited Transparency in Serbia
Serbia is among the countries where budget transparency is assessed as “limited,” scoring 53 out of a possible 100 points in the international Open Budget Index (OBI) survey, Transparency Serbia announced. Serbia has improved by two points compared to the previous round of this survey, which is conducted every two years. Of…
... detaljnije ...Corruption Perceptions Index 2025: Serbia scores worst in the past two decades
In the ranking of countries and territories by the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), Serbia, with a score of 33 and 116th place, has further worsened its result and, for the first time, is ranked the worst in the region. Serbia’s index is two points lower than last year and the lowest…
... detaljnije ...Harmful consequences of changes in judicial regulations on the fight against corruption
Changes to judicial regulations will likely reduce the possibilities of the Prosecutor's Office for Organized Crime to investigate possible corruption of high-ranking public officials. The consequences of the legal changes are even more harmful because the performance in prosecuting "high corruption" has not been satisfactory until now, and all of…
... detaljnije ...Urgent Amendments to Judicial Laws – Bypassing the Profession and European Standards and Amounting to Political Retaliation for “Disobedience”
The Working Group of the National Convention on the European Union for Chapter 23 warns the public about the serious risks posed by the scheduling of an extraordinary session of the National Assembly for 14 January, at which amendments to systemic judicial laws will be considered under an urgent procedure.[1]…
... detaljnije ...
Fewer state-owned enterprises have a legal director
Of the 34 state-owned enterprises, regardless of whether they are in the status of public enterprises (PE), JSC or LLC, which would have to choose a director in a public competition, only two enter the year 2026 with a legally appointed director. Elektroprivreda Srbije got a director after a competition in…
... detaljnije ...New Year and Christmas holidays
Transparency Serbia's Office will be closed from January 1 until January 7. The first working day after the holiday will be Wednesday, January 8 2026.
... detaljnije ...Fight Against Corruption in the Executive Branch and the Police – A Year of Missed Opportunities
The Government of Serbia will not meet the recommendations for preventing corruption in the executive branch and the police that it received from GRECO in 2022, even by the second deadline, which expires in ten days, according to an analysis published today by Transparency Serbia. With regard to legislation, in 2025…
... detaljnije ...Elections in Mionica, Negotin, and Sečanj – Ministers Intensively Campaigning, Irregularities in Financing
The campaign for the November elections in three municipalities is the clearest indication that there is no intention to implement the key ODIHR recommendation from June 2024 – separating party activities from the state and preventing the misuse of public resources. In addition to local officials, national-level officials also participated…
... detaljnije ...Transparency Serbia in IBP's bulletin: leading voice in the Western Balkans
International Budget Partnership presented, in its bulletin, TI Serbia's efforts for deeper transparency and stronger oversight of public resources: Our long-time partner Transparency Serbia shows how sustained advocacy and credible data can strengthen accountability in public procurement. Since 2006, they have worked with us through the Open Budget Survey, using its…
... detaljnije ...Authentic Interpretation of the “Law” on the General Staff – Triple Legal Violence
The authentic “interpretation” of a special “law” for the General Staff, adopted under urgent procedure by the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and Legislation, constitutes a threefold act of legal violence and, instead of strengthening the rule of law, reinforces the construction of a lawless state. Transparency Serbia therefore calls on Members…
... detaljnije ...A Special Law Will Undermine Not Only the General Staff Building but the Legal System as Well
The draft of the special law concerning the land plots of the former General Staff, which the Parliament is set to place on the agenda in an expedited procedure, represents a combination of the two most dangerous forms of corruption – the legalization of law violations and the tailoring of general…
... detaljnije ...The Importance of the European Parliament’s Resolution for the Fight Against Corruption
In the draft of the European Parliament’s resolution which is being adopted on the occasion of the anniversary of the tragic collapse of the canopy in Novi Sad, and amid protests and polarization in society, the key problems of corruption in Serbia are addressed far more clearly and decisively than…
... detaljnije ...A Year of Concealed Information and False Claims
Serbia marks another International Right to Know Day, while problems in this field remain unresolved. Over the past year, in addition to the denial of important information upon request, numerous cases have been recorded in which public authorities falsely claimed that they did not possess the requested documents. Combined with…
... detaljnije ...Law on Legalization of Buildings – Breach of Rules and Corruption Risks
The announced adoption of the draft law introducing a new framework for the legalization of buildings at tomorrow’s session of the Government of Serbia would constitute a violation of several laws and of the Government’s Rules of Procedure, since no public debate was held and no corruption risk analysis was…
... detaljnije ...
- 1
- 2
- 3
